Kathleen Savio Letters,Plea's,Police Calls, Wills

[Lorie Taylor]

Kathleens Order of Protection On Drew Peterson

www.amw.com/pdf/peter001.PDF

[Lorie Taylor]

03/11/2002 Petition for 14 Day Emergency Order of Protection, Page 18 and Page 19
of America's Most Wanted .PDF File (Case No: 2002 OP 000460 Will Co, IL)

[Lorie Taylor]

03/11/2002 Petition for 14 Day Emergency Order of Protection, Page 21
of America's Most Wanted .PDF File (Case No: 2002 OP 000460 Will Co, IL)

DETAILS OF ABUSE: "A phone conversation was made that he is coming over to have to deal with me, He wants me dead, and if he has to he will burn the house down just to shut me up. I called after I drop my children off school, he came running after me, ready to beat me up. He (?) for me to return home to teach me a lesson, he has a gun, and other weapon I believe he will use on me. He just doesn't care if he lives or dies, or I live or die."

www.acandyrose.com/kathleen_savio_031102OrderProtection.htm

2002 OP 000460 Judge: POLICANDRIOTES CARLA
PETERSON KATHLEEN (Pro Se) vs PETERSON DREW (Beck Alexander Hilding)

3/11/2002 Order Protection Plaintiff PETERSON KATHLEEN Defendant PETERSON DREW

3/11/2002 ORDER OF PROTECTION FILED

3/11/2002 AFFIDAViIT

3/11/2002 PETITION FOR 14 DAY EMERGENCY ORDER OF PROTECTION

3/11/2002 Plaintiff present, pro se. Matter comes on for Emergency Order of Protection. Witness sworn, evidence heard. For good cause shown, Order of Protection is granted. Hearing on extension is set. Seven day summons is ordered to issue. Judge: ALLEN JAMES JEFFREY Rep: ROSS NIOMI Clerk: JLBE M

3/11/2002 Priority Form Processed, taken to Sheriff and/or given to Plaintiff for service out of county, this date, March 11, 2002. Document EOPBLUE Was Printed. Hearing April 01, 2002 09:30AM Judge O.P. EXTENSIONS, Judge: ALLEN JAMES JEFFREY Clerk: MALT M

3/18/2002 SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED DREW PETERSON ON 3/12/2002

3/19/2002 Motion to REOPEN ORDER OF PROTECTION PHONED BY ATTY BECK. Motions Mar 22, 2002 09:30AM Judge O.P. EXTENSIONS

3/22/2002 Appearance Filed For Drew Peterson FILED BY Atty BECK ALEXANDER HILD

3/22/2002 Cause comes on for extension on Order of Protction. Plaintiff present with attorney, B. Grady. Defendant present with attorney Alex Beck. By agreement and pursuant to 02 D 420 and 02 D 428. The Order of protection is dismissed. Status: Dismissed Case Report: Terminated Mar 22, 2002. Judge: POLICANDRIOTES CARLA Clerk: LLPR M

3/22/2002 SEE ORDER SIGNED. Judge: POLICANDRIOTES CARLA Clerk: LLPR M

[Lorie Taylor]

03/11/2002 Petition for 14 Day Emergency Order of Protection, Page 22
of America's Most Wanted .PDF File (Case No: 2002 OP 000460 Will Co, IL)

PREVIOUS ABUSE: "Several time, he has restrained me, held me down, knocked me into a walls, came after me with a poker, ripped my necklace off, left marks on my body all the time. Threatened to steal the kids, and desert me. Put dead bolt on door, he broke through it."

Award physical care of the following children to the petitioner: Kris Peterson 7yr, Thomas Peterson 9yr.

Visitation as follows: Every Sunday starting March 16th pick up at 12:30 and return at 6:00pm. Every Monday starting March 17, 2002 from 6:00pm to 8:00pm.

Petitioner is granted exclusive possession of the following items of personal property: Jewelry[/img]

[Lorie Taylor]

KATHLEENS LETTER TO THE STATES ATTY:


Kathleen Savio's November 14, 2002 Letter to Illinois Assistant State Attorney (.PDF 3.38mg)
Transcribed by www.acandyrose.com


November 14, 2002

Elizbeth Fragale
Assistant States Attorney

States Attorney
121 N. Chicago Street
Joliet, Illinois 60432

Ms. Fragle,

On three different occasions I have tried to reach you over the phone regarding charges I have filed agains Drew Peterson, on the date of July 5, 2002.

Note, I did contact the police department, and talked to assistant Chief Mike Calcagno, in reference to Drew Break in that same weekend. I than filed a report in regards to my safety, from Drew by two officer that arrive at my residents 392 Pheasant Chase, Bolingbrook, Il 60490.

When I found out that Mr. Peterson was having an affair with a minor at the police department, he began to get very violent. By striking me with his hand and chasing me though the house with a police stick. At that time on record, I had to get an order of protection from him.

Their has been several times throughout my marriage to this man where I ended up in the emergency room in Bolingbrook for injuries, and I have reported this only to have the police leave my home wthout filing any reports.

On July 5th, Mr. Peterson got into my home with a garage door opener he programmed for himself, while I was out of town with my son's. I was unaware of his presents, and was very afraid for my live. This man pop out from our living room while I was walking down stair, with a basket of laundry. I was shocked and dropped all the cloths, and stood their, asking him to get out. Drew was in uniform (Swat Uniform), with his police radio in his ear. He yelled, for me to sit down and be quiet I refused and he pushed me on the stairs. He told me to move down to the third step and not to move or speak. He was very angry that in our divorce the judge ruled that he would have to pay me child support. He told me that he didn't want to pay me anything. (He left my Boys, 8 And 9 and I With many bills, up to 2,000.00 and with an 11,000.00 income tax bill as well as a 6800.00 property tax bill for us to pay. Needless to say we are without money or any credit) He kept me in position for very long length of time, while trying to convince me how horrible I am, and I just need to die. He asked me several times if I was afraid, I started to panic! He pulled out his knife, that he kept tied around his leg and brought it to my neck. I thought I'd never see my boys again. I told him to just end this craziness and for some reason pulled back. I didn't tell the police because I know they can't protect me from him. I know he will be back; he's now attempting to try to make me look like the bad guy, with untrue charges of Battery against him, and his 17 yr. old Girlfriend. The sick thing is I really think they're enjoying this. Over the summer they went out of their way to rollerblade right in front of my home, drive by and stop for long lengths of time in front of the house. Childish things like his girl friend flipping me off if I was out in the front with the kids while driving by.

At present time my children have been in a program at school called rainbows, in efforts to repair some of the damage Drew and his girlfriend has created. One of which Drew falsely arrested me in front of my children with my face in the grass, and calling me a criminal for hitting his girlfriend, which didn't happen. Instead she called me a bounce of innapropriate name in front of my children, so I felt it necessary to get them back in the house away from this. When I ran to the truck, it being very high up I notices Stacy his girlfriend taping me, with stolen camera Drew took from our home. I attempted to take the camera and my next goal was to return to my home with my children. But I was thrown to the ground and treated like an outlaw, and booked and arrested for no reason. My wrist was sprained, when I was being thrown to the ground and held down by Drew, who was not on duty at the time. While this was happening my children were being held against their own will by Stacy Cales, while she told them to sit down and be quiet. My son's phyc is working with them but states "she can't fix what continue to happen on a on going basis". My eight year old come home from spending one hour with his Dad, because he really is never there, and pushes his sons and girlfriend on my son all the time, and expressed to me that he was confused! It seems that Drews live in girl friend showed both my sons her wedding dress and ring, and told them that she was going to marry their father. Of course that's ok for Adults, but when my boys come home with tears in their eyes, still hoping for mom and dad to get back together again, it becomes heart breaking and very confusing for them. They don't understand how dad can get married if he's still married to their mommy. The list goes on, and I understand its just part of it, but it needs to stop. My sons and I would like to move away from this area, for our safety and our sanctity. I am a full time Nursing Student and Drew left me while in the middle of the program. I don't want my career or my sons to suffer this nightmare anymore.

He knows how to manipulate the system, and his next step is to take my children away Or Kill me instead.

I would really like to know why this man wasn't charged with unlawful entry, and attempt on my life. I am willing to take any test you want tme to take to prove my innocents of charges against me, and also any lie detector test, on the my statement I filed against him. I really feel, Drew is a loose cannon, he is out on the streets of Bolingbrook patrolling, and just taking the law into his own hands. I haven't received help from the Police here in Bolingbrook, and am asking for your help now. Before it's too late. I really hope that by filing this charge it might stop him from trying to hurt us.

Please return my call, or write with answers to my questions.
630-759-3562
Sincerely, Kathleen Peterson
cc: Walter Jacobson

[Lorie Taylor]

DREW AND KATHLEEN SAVIOS HANDWRITTEN WILL SUPPOSIVELY SIGNED BY KATHLEEN SAVIO FOUND WAY AFTER KATHLEEN SAVIO'S DEATH. KATHLEEN SAVIO'S ATTY HAS SAID KATHLEEN DIDN'T HAVE A WILL.

DREW PETERSON AND KATHLEEN SAVIOS HOUSE OH PHEASANT CHASE





[/img]

[Lorie Taylor]

SOME OF KATHLEENS JEWERLY

[Lorie Taylor]

KATHLEEN SAVIO EMERGENCY ROOM VISIT

[Lorie Taylor]

Transcribed by ATL, and ACANDYROSE


UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT
(Filed on 02/07/2006 with COUNTY OF WILL ) Will County Circuit Clerk)

STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) SS
COUNTY OF WILL )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS

ESTATE OF)
)
KATHLEEN SAVIO,) NO. 2004 P 188
)
Deceased)


FIRST AND FINAL REPORT

The undersigned, Richard J. Kavanagh, Public Administrator of Will County and former Administrator of the Estate of Kathleen Savio, Deceased, would respectfully submit to the Court the following First and Final Report of his acts and doings as such Administrator from April 21, 2004 to January 30, 2006.

DATE ITEMS OF RECEIPT AMOUNT

09/23/04 CITIZENS FINANCIAL - SERVICES CLOSE CHECKING ACCOUNT 827.32

09/23/04 COMCAST REFUND 6.94

10/11/04 VERIZON – SALE OF 24.6261 SHARES 982.57

12/08/04 NICOR GAS REFUND 162.09

05/17/05 U.S. TREASURY TAX REFUND FOR 2004 201.00

05/17/05 U.S. TREASURY TAX REFUND FOR 2003 741.00

06/22/05 DANIEL W. HYNES INCOME TAX REFUND FOR 2004 27.00

07/19/05 DANIEL W. HYNES STATE OF ILLINOIS TAX REFUND 130.00

. TOTAL RECEIPTS $3,077.92

~ ~ 1 ~ ~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DATE ITEMS OF DISBURSEMENT AMOUNT

10/25/04 NICOR GAS (93) 738.41

11/18/04 COM ED (1001) 196.73

12/08/04 LINDA RYMSZA (1002) (MILEAGE TO BOLINGBROOK CITIZENS FINANCIAL) 16.65

08/11/05 CANCELLED CHECKS RETURNED 3.00

09/13/05 CANCELLED CHECKS RETURNED 3.00

10/12/05 CANCELLED CHECKS RETURNED 3.00

. TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $960.79


. RECAPITULATION .

. Total amount received $3,077.92

. Total amount paid out 960.79

. Balance on hand December 19, 2005: $2,117.13



Richard J. Kavanagh, Public Administrator of Will County and Administrator of the Estate of Kathleen Savio, Deceased, further reports the residence of the decedent located at 392 Pheasant Chase Drive, Bolingbrook, Illinois was sold pursuant to court order, and the net proceeds of the sale totaling $287,154.00 were held in escrow pursuant to court order pending a final order in the case of Peterson v. Peterson, Case No. 02 D 420.

The closing for the sale of the residence took place in October, 2004. The title to the residence was in the names of Drew Peterson and Kathleen Peterson, husband and wife, not as joint tenants or tenants in common but as tenants by the entirety.

The divorce proceeding between Drew Peterson and Kathleen (Savio) Peterson (02 D 420) was bifurcated, with a judgment of dissolution entered prior to the death of the decedent, and the Court (Judge Susan O’Leary) reserving the issue of the division of the property of the parties pending further proceedings.

~ ~ 2 ~ ~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Kathleen (Savio) Peterson was represented by Attorney Harry Smith of the firm of Rice & Smith, Ltd., while Drew Peterson was represented first by Attorney Alex Beck and subsequently by Attorney Joseph Mazzone.

After my appointment as Administrator, I conferred with Attorney Harry Smith with respect to the status of the property settlement portion of the divorce proceeding, and also attended several status hearings before Judge O’Leary. Attorney Smith continued to represent the Estate of Kathleen (Savio) Peterson in the divorce proceedings.

Attorney Smith advised me that there were three (3) major issues with respect to the division of property, viz: (1) whether Kathleen’s estate would be entitled to any portion of the Drew Peterson pension; (2) the valuation of the business known as the Blue Lightning Corporation, which had been sold with all of the proceeds going to Drew Peterson; and (3) the value of the house, and whether Kathleen (Savio) Peterson’s estate would be entitled to receive not only her one-half of the proceeds of any sale, but an additional portion of the remaining one-half as an offset for the cash taken by Drew Peterson from the sale of the business.

Attorney Smith further advised me that it was his opinion that after a full and complete hearing on the property settlement, the estate of Kathleen (Savio) Peterson would be awarded: (1) Kathleen’s one-half of the proceeds from the sale of the residence; and (2) most, if not all, of Drew Peterson’s one-half of the proceeds from the sale of the residence as an offset for the business sale proceeds retained by Drew Peterson.

On March 23, 2005, after hearing, Judge Lechwar entered an order admitting the Last Will and Testament of Kathleen Peterson to probate and appointing James Carroll, the uncle of Drew Peterson, as executor of the estate of Kathleen (Savio) Peterson. The new representative immediately fired Harry Smith as attorney for the estate of Kathleen (Savio) Peterson in the divorce proceeding.

Sixteen days later, on April 8, 2005, a “Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage” was entered in Case 02 D 420 by Judge Michael Powers “upon the agreement of the parties as to all issues.” The judgment awarded Drew Peterson not only the business known as the Blue Lightning Corporation, but also all the proceeds from the sale of the marital home, and further provided that Drew Peterson would not be obligated to fund any college expenses for the minor children of the parties due to the fact that life insurance on the life of Kathleen in the amount of $1,000,000 had been payable to the children. A copy of the judgment is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

The Estate was represented by the Executor, James Carroll, who appeared pro se. No one appeared for the residuary beneficiaries of the estate, who were the two minor children of the decedent, Kathleen (Savio) Peterson, and the two step-children of the decedent. The effect of the judgment was to transfer anywhere from $144,117.65 to $288,235.31 (one-half to all of the proceeds of the home sale) from the four children who were the beneficiaries of the estate of Kathleen (Savio) Peterson to Drew Peterson, the former husband of the decedent and the father of the four children. The actions of the Executor were not in the best interest of the Estate or its beneficiaries.

~ ~ 3 ~ ~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




In addition to the cash detailed above, the Administrator obtained possession of certain items of jewelry, which have been listed on the inventory filed contemporaneously with this report and which were given to Michael Overmann, attorney for the Estate, on February 1, 2006. All of the remaining items of personal property of the decedent had been removed from the decedent’s residence prior to the appointment of the administrator in April of 2004.

There were also three claims which were timely filed against the estate, and copies of those claims were provided to the attorney for the executor on April 25, 2004. Those claims were the following:

1 Omnium Worldwide, Inc. for People’s Bank $5,513.68

2 Citibank (SD) NA/BPET $ 141.76

3 Attorney Timothy P. McHugh $ 729.00


In addition, the Administrator has contemporaneously filed a Petition for Administrator’s and Attorney’s fees, and has requested a hearing on said Petition.

Richard J. Kavanagh, Public Administrator of Will County and Administrator of the Estate of Kathleen Savio, Deceased, now moves the Court that he may be approved of his acts and doings as above set forth, and having made and taken receipts therefore, and presented to this Court, asks the Report be approved and he be discharged as Administrator of the Estate, all of which is respectfully submitted.


________________________________Signature
Richard J. Kavanagh, Public Administrator of Will
County and Administrator of the Estate of Kathleen
Savio, Deceased


~ ~ 4 ~ ~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/636553,4_1_JO06_MISSING_S2.article

Court filings tell story
November 6, 2007
By STEWART WARREN STAFF WRITER

JOLIET -- Although we don't know much about Stacy Peterson's disappearance, we know other things.

They are found in files at the Will County Courthouse.

Knit together, these facts tell something about Bolingbrook Police Sgt. Drew Peterson, the missing woman's much-older husband. For example, while married to another woman, Drew Peterson, 53, owned several businesses and life insurance policies -- and that third wife later was found drowned in a bathtub without any water.

Fourth wife Stacy Peterson, a 23-year-old mother of two, hasn't been seen since Oct. 28. The young woman was supposed to help family members paint a house, but never showed. Drew Peterson claims his wife simply deserted him, but a family member reported her missing.

Savio's death

In early 2002, Drew Peterson and Kathleen Savio, the third wife, began divorce proceedings, according to court documents. They had been married about 10 years and had two children. In late 2003, Will County Judge Susan O'Leary dissolved their marriage. Their divorce was "bifurcated," in this case meaning they were allowed to divorce before their common property was divided, according to court documents.

Then in March 2004, a neighbor found Savio dead in the dry bathtub at her Bolingbrook home. It was an accident, Will County Coroner Patrick K. O'Neil ruled. The 40-year-old woman suffered blunt trauma and a lacerated scalp, injuries consistent with a fall that could have knocked her unconscious, according to the inquest. By that time, Drew Peterson already was involved with the then-Stacy Cales, who was 17 when they met.

After Savio died, there was a Will County probate case to settle her financial affairs. Well-known local lawyer Dick Kavanagh was the public administrator of Will County, a governor-appointed position. Simply put, the public administrator tries to find the fairest way to settle an estate after a death, among other things.

A will emerges

A year after Savio's death and the beginning of the legal proceedings to settle her affairs, a will emerged. It was submitted in court on March 23, 2005. Hand-written in capital letters, it was scrawled across two pieces of lined notebook paper and witnessed by Alex J. Morelli and Gary L. Marcolina.

A man named Alex Morelli is a Bolingbrook police officer, and Herald News archives show a man named Gary Marcolina is a developer in the Crest Hill area.

"This day March 2nd 1997 Drew Walter Peterson and Kathleen Savio Peterson, both being of sound body and mind, do hereby bequeath all of our worldly possessions to each other in the event of either of our individual deaths," begins the will filed with court documents.

If they died together, the couple wanted everything to go to certain people, among them Tom and Kris Peterson, their children, and Eric Drew Peterson and Stephen Paul Peterson, Drew Peterson's children from another relationship.

The will lists some of their assets:

• A Golden Rule life insurance policy valued at $100,000

• A Monumental Life Insurance policy valued at $125,000

• A Prudential Life Insurance policy valued at $308,137.59 -- "Beneficiary Merchants Bank Oswego to pay off note for Sud's Pub in Montgomery," according to the will.

• Bolingbrook Police Pension fund of more than $50,000

• A piece of real estate listed as 9 Clay Court, Montgomery

• The Blue Lightning Corp., or Sud's Pub, 1250 S. Broadway, Montgomery

• Da Page Corp., Fast 'N' Accurate Graphics, 87 Eisenhower South, Lombard

• A quarter interest in CMYK Corp., listed as a printing business in "Lombard-Naperville," according to the will.

Division of property issues

The will names James B. Carroll, Drew Peterson's uncle, executor of the estate, according to a document filed in court by Kavanagh, who apparently had some concerns.

"After my appointment as administrator, I conferred with attorney Harry Smith with respect to the status of the property settlement portion of the divorce proceeding ... (He) advised me that there were three major issues with respect to the division of property ... 1. Whether Kathleen's estate would be entitled to any portion of Drew Peterson's pension; 2. The valuation of the business known as the Blue Lightning Corp., which has been sold with all of the proceeds going to Drew Peterson; and 3. The value of the house, and whether Kathleen Peterson's estate would be entitled to receive not only her one-half of the proceeds of any sale, but an additional portion of the remaining one-half as an offset for the cash taken by Drew Peterson from the sale of the (bar)," Kavanaugh wrote in court documents.

On April 8, 2005, Will County Judge Michael Powers entered a judgment in the financial aspects of the divorce case. It awarded Drew Peterson the Blue Lightning Corp. and all the proceeds from the sale of the couple's home, according to the court documents filed by Kavanagh. The judgment also mentions what seems to be a fourth life insurance policy.

"(It) provided that Drew Peterson would not be obligated to fund any college expenses for the minor children of the parties due to the fact that life insurance on the life of Kathleen in the amount of $1 million had been payable to the children," according to the document.

As part of the judgment, Carroll agreed that some money from Savio's estate should go to someone other than the four children. "The effect of the judgment was to transfer anywhere from $144,117.65 to $288,235.31 (one-half to all of the proceeds of the home sale) from the four children who were the beneficiaries of the estate ... to Drew Peterson," according to court documents.

Kavanagh didn't approve of that move, apparently.

"The actions of (Carroll) were not in the best interest of the estate or the beneficiaries," he wrote in a court document.

Reporter Stewart Warren can be reached at [phone] or [e-mail]

[Lorie Taylor]

[Lorie Taylor]

Press Release # 07-55
Date: Friday, November 30, 2007
Time: 3:30 P.M. C.T.
Topic: Peterson / Savio Clarification
Prepared By: Lt. Ken Teppel #962
As requested by some members in the media, below is a summation of calls
for service relating to Drew Peterson, Stay Peterson, and Kathleen Savio.

Calls for service at 392 Pheasant Chase:
02-17-2002 – Domestic Trouble (Information Report) – Mutual argument between
Drew and Kathleen. Drew left the residence. Kathleen’s attorney was advised by
supervisor.
05-03-2002 – Domestic Trouble (Information Report) – Drew took the vehicle that
Kathleen was driving (both were registered owners and still married). Vehicle was
returned by Drew at 392 Pheasant Chase.
05-03-2002 – Domestic Battery, Disorderly Conduct(Crime Report) – Drew stated
that Kathleen struck him, spit at him, and pushed him in the back. Drew did not want
Kathleen arrested.
05-26-2002 – Battery (Crime Report) – Kathleen punched Stacy in the face because
she was in the car when Drew was attempting to drop the kids off. Kathleen was
arrested. Independent witnesses. Drew kept children. Kathleen charged and record was
expunged by court order.
05-26-2002 – Domestic Trouble (Information Report) – Kathleen complaining that she
had sole custody of children. No such specification in court order. Drew kept children.
06-25-2002 – Visitation Interference (Shift Log) – Drew claiming that Kathleen would
not turn over kids. Logged and referred to his civil attorney.
07-05-02 – Criminal Trespass, Unlawful Restraint, Domestic Battery (Crime Report)
- Kathleen claimed Drew broke into the house, and held her against her will. This was
Peterson Release 07-55.doc
Bolingbrook Police Department
375 W. Briarcliff Road
Bolingbrook, IL 60440-0951
reported two weeks after the date of occurrence on 07-18-2002. Kathleen did not wish
to file a complaint but report was forwarded to State’s Attorney for review
07-11-2002 – Visitation Interference (Shift Log) – Kathleen claiming Drew was
violating a court order. Logged for documentation.
12-05-2002 – Well Being Check, Visitation Interference (Shift Log) – Kathy claiming
Drew is outside pounding on door. Kathleen states the kids are sick and she will not
give them to Drew. Logged for documentation, referred to their attorneys.
12-05-2002 – Alleged Violation of Order of Protection, Visitation Interference (Shift
Log) – Drew upset he was not getting kids. No Order of Protection had been issued by
the court. Logged for documentation.
12-20-2002 – Notification (Shift Log) – Kathleen called advising she sent Stacy a
certified letter advising that she will be arrested for trespass for future violations. Logged
for documentation.
01-02-2003 – Notification (Shift Log) – Kathleen called stating that the kids had a late
doctor’s appointment and that she would not make the scheduled drop off time to Drew.
Logged for documentation.
02-18-2003 – Citizen Assist (Shift Log) – Drew wanted to pick up kids. Kathleen stated
they were sick and she was not turning them over. Logged for documentation.
06-02-2003 – Residential Burglary (Crime Report) – Kathleen believes someone
entered the rear sliding glass door and took her diamond wedding ring and a pair of
diamond earrings out of her bedroom and a camera out of the kitchen. Drew denies any
involvement. No witnesses or evidence.
09-04-2003 – Visitation Interference (Shift Log) – Kathleen claims Drew did not drop
the kids off on time. Logged for documentation.
09-09-2003 – Visitation Interference (Shift Log) – Kathleen upset that Drew is 10
minutes late in dropping off the children. Logged for documentation.
09-09-2003 – Disorderly Conduct (Crime Report) – Kathleen claims Stacy called her
several derogatory names while Drew was dropping off the children. Referred to the
State’s Attorney’s office for complaints.
11-11-2003 – Visitation Interference (Shift Log) – Kathleen claiming Drew has children
too long. Logged for documentation.
Peterson Release 07-55.doc
Bolingbrook Police Department
375 W. Briarcliff Road
Bolingbrook, IL 60440-0951

[Lorie Taylor]

This is a transcription of the Anonymous letter sent to Kathleen.

My best efforts transcribing anonymous letter to Kathleen Savio. _____ indicates unable to read.

Kathy,

This letter is being sent to you for your benefit. At this point in time you are probably well aware that your husband is having an affair. The girls name (and she is just that a girl) is Stacy Yelton born July 17, 1984 _____ at _____ apartments Bolingbrook IL

You may already have all of this information but if not you will need to prevent any further embarrassment and disgrace to your family. This affair has been going on for several months and several people have been aware of this situation. Because of her age (17) and the fact that she is an employee of the village and because of Drew’s age and his occupation he holds a position of authority over her. Drew could be charged criminally for his intimate involvement with this minor.

Village officials (Mayor, Trustees) and everyone at the Police Department have complete knowledge of this situation. It has been and ongoing joke within the department. The issue has been discussed and has been decided to ?conceal? his behavior to protect the village and Drew because of his political _____ with Roger Claar and Ken Each they are protecting themselves from the embarrassment and the liability.
The real victim (being you and your family) should be the ones being protected from the embarrassment.

[Lorie Taylor]

THIS IS FROM ACANDYROSE.COM

12/00/2001 The Anonymous Letter

(Letter sent to Kathleen Savio to inform her of Drew’s affair with Stacy)

www.acandyrose.com/2001-12-00-AnonymousLetter.htm


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE: The following is an "AS IS" transcript of the anonymous letter apparently sent to Kathleen Savio Peterson [Estimated to be around December 2001] to inform her at the time, that her husband Drew Peterson was having an affair with a 17 year old woman, that woman now being the missing 4th wife, Stacy Peterson as of October 28, 2007.



The letter had been talked about in the media, on public message forums as well as talk shows for weeks but it wasn't until December 21, 2007 that the letter was shown on the NBC Dateline show "Deadly suspicion." At that time a partial screen capture was obtained and from that capture the transcript was done and to maintain the integrity of the original document, any and all typing errors and/or incorrect information remained intact.



That Internet poster under the name of "dethead" then shared the "AS IS" transcript on a public message forum. This is ONLY a partial transcript of page 1 of the letter, what could be obtained from the screen capture. At this time it is not known how many pages comprised the complete letter.



NOTE: Kathleen Savio's neighbor, Steve Carcerano stated on the Nancy Grace show on 12/17/2007 "There was a letter stuck in the mailbox. It was typewritten. It was many pages. And it was someone revealing the fact that Drew had a girlfriend, which was Stacy at the time."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Kathleen Letter (Found on the www.findstacypeterson.com forum but was deleted from that forum, reason given was because "DetHead" posted a transcript of a document with known errors)



Transcribed by a poster known as "DetHead."



DetHead

Full Member

Posts: 607

Thread titled, "Kathleen Letter" on: Today [12/25/2007] at 02:55:31 AM



Letter received by kS as seen on Dateline NBC:



"Kathy,



This letter is being sent to you for your benefit. At this point and time you are probably well aware that your husband is having an affair. The girl's name (and she is just that, a girl) is stacy Yelton born 7/17/1984, resides at Preston Apt-129 Bolingbrook,Il.



You may already have all of this information but if not, you will need it to prevent andy further embarrassment and disgrace to you and your family. This affair has been going on for several months and several people have been aware of this situation. Because of her age (17) and the fact that she is an employee of the village and because of Drew's age and his occupation, he holds a position of authprity over her. drew could be charged criminally for his intimate involvement with this minor.



Village officials (mayor, trustee's) and everyone at the police department have complete knowledge of this situation. It has been an ongoing joke within the department. Teh issue has been discussed and has been decided to conceal his behavior to protect the village and Drew. Because of his political alliance with Roger Claar and ken Each, they are protecting themselves from the embarrasment and the liability. The real victims (being you and your family) should be the ones being protected from the embarrassment.



This is not the first time in the past year that Drew's immoral and unethical behavior has been concealed. This past summer Drew allowed the beating of an arrestee who was handcuffed and defenseless. The past fall Drew was suspected to have planted narcotics (cocaine) on two superate drug raids to obtain a substantial arrest to overshadow his recent behavior and now his illegal intimate relationship with a minor.



Drew has been willing to sacrifice hs integrity for his personal gain with total disregard that his actions will embarress and disrespect his wife and children. BEWARE whom you talk to within the village administration and within the police department.....(remaining portion not visible)"



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KNOWN FACTUAL ERRORS IN THE KATHLEEN LETTER:



1 - Stacy's maiden name was not "Stacy Yelton" it was Stacy Cales.



2 - The name "Yelton" is Stacy's brother's FIRST name. (Yelton Cales)



3 - Stacy's birthday is 01/20/1984 and Yelton's is 08/07/1979 (Neither was born July 17th).



4 - "the fact that she is an employee of the village" (Stacy was employed with the village of Bolingbrook for "ONLY 6 WEEKS" between November 5th and December 17th of 2001 which possibly dates the letter during that period).



5 - *IF* the letter was written in the late fall of 2001 then Stacy would have been age 17, which according to Illinois law is not under age.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KNOWN FACTS IN THE LETTER:



1 - Roger Claar is the Mayor of Bolingbrook, Illinois.



2 - Ken Each was the former Police Chief of Bolingbrook, Illinois.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Lorie Taylor]

Kathleen Savio vs Drew Peterson:

03/11/2002 Petition for 14 Day Emergency Order of Protection, Page 22

(Case No: 2002 OP 000460 Will Co, IL)

Transcribed by www.acandyrose.com



DETAILS OF ABUSE: "A phone conversation was made that he is coming over to have to deal with me, He wants me dead, and if he has to he will burn the house down just to shut me up. I called after I drop my children off school, he came running after me, ready to beat me up. He (?) for me to return home to teach me a lesson, he has a gun, and other weapon I believe he will use on me. He just doesn't care if he lives or dies, or I live or die."



PREVIOUS ABUSE: "Several time, he has restrained me, held me down, knocked me into a walls, came after me with a poker, ripped my necklace off, left marks on my body all the time. Threatened to steal the kids, and desert me. Put dead bolt on door, he broke through it."

[Lorie Taylor]

Summary of police calls relating to Drew Peterson and his current, former wives

Associated Press - November 30, 2007 11:04 PM ET

The Bolingbrook Police Department has released a summary of calls for service relating to former Sgt. Drew Peterson, his third wife Kathleen Savio, who died in March 2004, and fourth wife Stacy Peterson, who disappeared Oct. 28. The summaries include the location of the conflict, date, type of call, reason for call, and action taken:

Calls for service at 392 Pheasant Chase:

Feb. 2, 2002: Domestic Trouble - Mutual argument between Drew and Kathleen. Drew left the residence. Kathleen's attorney was advised by supervisor.

May 3, 2002: Domestic Trouble - Drew took the vehicle that Kathleen was driving (both were registered owners and still married). Vehicle was returned by Drew at 392 Pheasant Chase.

May 3, 2002: Domestic Battery, Disorderly Conduct - Drew stated that Kathleen struck him, spit at him, and pushed him in the back. Drew did not want Kathleen arrested.

May 26, 2002: Battery - Kathleen punched Stacy in the face because she was in the car when Drew was attempting to drop the kids off. Kathleen was arrested. Independent witnesses. Drew kept children. Kathleen charged and record was expunged by court order.

May 26, 2002: Domestic Trouble - Kathleen complaining that she had sole custody of children. No such specification in court order. Drew kept children.

June 25, 2002: Visitation Interference - Drew claiming that Kathleen would not turn over kids. Logged and referred to his civil attorney.

July 5, 2002: Criminal Trespass, Unlawful Restraint, Domestic Battery - Kathleen claimed Drew broke into the house, and held her against her will. This was reported two weeks after the date of occurrence on 7-18-2002. Kathleen did not wish to file a complaint but report was forwarded to state's attorney for review.

July 11, 2002: Visitation Interference - Kathleen claiming Drew was violating a court order. Logged for documentation.

Dec. 5, 2002: Well Being Check, Visitation Interference - Kathy claiming Drew is outside pounding on door. Kathleen states the kids are sick and she will not give them to Drew. Logged for documentation, referred to their attorneys.

Dec. 5, 2002: Alleged Violation of Order of Protection, Visitation Interference - Drew upset he was not getting kids. No Order of Protection had been issued by the court. Logged for documentation.

Dec. 20, 2002: Notification - Kathleen called advising she sent Stacy a certified letter advising that she will be arrested for trespass for future violations. Logged for documentation.

Jan. 2, 2003: Notification - Kathleen called stating that the kids had a late doctor's appointment and that she would not make the scheduled drop off time to Drew. Logged for documentation.

Feb. 18, 2003: Citizen Assist - Drew wanted to pick up kids. Kathleen stated they were sick and she was not turning them over. Logged for documentation.

June 2, 2003: Residential Burglary - Kathleen believes someone entered the rear sliding glass door and took her diamond wedding ring and a pair of diamond earrings out of her bedroom and a camera out of the kitchen. Drew denies any involvement. No witnesses or evidence.

Sept. 4, 2003: Visitation Interference - Kathleen claims Drew did not drop the kids off on time. Logged for documentation.

Sept. 9, 2003: Visitation Interference - Kathleen upset that Drew is 10 minutes late in dropping off the children. Logged for documentation.

Sept. 9, 2003: Disorderly Conduct - Kathleen claims Stacy called her several derogatory names while Drew was dropping off the children. Referred to the state's attorney's office for complaints.

Nov. 11, 2003: Visitation Interference - Kathleen claiming Drew has children too long. Logged for documentation.

Calls for service at 6 Pheasant Chase Ct.:

April 28, 2002: Domestic Battery - Kathleen showed up at Drew's residence and starting removing items from Drew's truck. Drew came outside and Kathleen started hitting him in the back. Drew filed a report but never followed up with state's attorney for charges.
tinyurl.com/yt983h

[Lorie Taylor]

[Lorie Taylor]

[Lorie Taylor]

Drew Peterson and Kathleen Savio's financial battles
DREW PETERSON CASE | Kathleen Savio's family doubts Drew's third wife signed off on deal to buy house; handwriting analysis also raises some questions
Comments

January 25, 2008

BY CHRIS FUSCO, DAN ROZEK AND STEFANO ESPOSITO Staff Reporters

Before Drew Peterson could buy a house in 2002 for himself and his 18-year-old girlfriend, Stacy Cales, he needed his estranged wife, Kathleen Savio, to sign off on the deal.

But Savio's signature on the legal document looks markedly different from more than a dozen others she had written before she died in 2004, a Chicago Sun-Times investigation has found.
» Click to enlarge image
Kathleen Savio's family say her signature on documents signing away her share of Drew's home were forged.
(Courtesy/Sun-Times)


» Click to enlarge image
Kathleen Savio's family say her signature on documents signing away her share of Drew's home were forged.
(Sun-Times/Courtesy files)




"That's definitely not her signature," Savio's sister, Anna Doman, said after viewing a copy of the one-page power of attorney that Drew Peterson himself notarized. "I know that's not her signature."

An analysis by a forensic document examiner also found some differences.

Ellen Mulcrone Schuetzner, whom the Sun-Times hired to study legal and business papers tied to Peterson and Savio, questioned the "proportions of letterforms, ending strokes, slant, spacing and size of the signature." Schuetzner, however, couldn't reach a definitive conclusion based on the quality and number of documents available to her.

"I can't eliminate the possibility that it is or isn't her signature," said Schuetzner, who has nearly 30 years of experience in her field.

Drew Peterson -- a retired Bolingbrook police sergeant -- insisted the signature is valid but referred questions about it to his attorney. Officials with the State Police and Will County state's attorney's office declined to comment.

The questions about the signature come as investigators probe Peterson's financial affairs in hopes of finding clues about Savio's death, as well as the disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, sources say. Stacy was 18 when she moved into the 6 Pheasant Chase Court house in Bolingbrook with Drew Peterson. She hasn't been seen since Oct. 28.

Savio's death -- once ruled an accidental bathtub drowning -- is being reinvestigated in the wake of Stacy's disappearance.

While they haven't named Drew Peterson a suspect in Savio's death, they have said they believe he was involved in Stacy's disappearance.
A valid will?

Questions are also being raised about a two-page handwritten will signed by Savio and Drew Peterson that's dated March 2, 1997. The document was taken into evidence by investigators Dec. 19, court records indicate.

One of the two witnesses who signed the will, Bolingbrook police officer Alex J. Morelli, has appeared before a Will County grand jury hearing evidence about Savio's death. Attempts to reach Morelli and the other witness, Gary L. Marcolina, were unsuccessful.

In a recent interview, Peterson, 53, said there is nothing wrong with the will, which was filed 15 days after Savio was found dead on March 1, 2004.

"We just tucked it away, and I found it after she died," Peterson said of the will. "There's nothing sinister and out-of-line about it. Everything was done proper."

At the time she died, Savio, 40, was in a court battle with Peterson over proceeds from the sale of a tavern they'd owned. Peterson, she claimed, had kept all the money from that sale.

The will named Peterson's uncle James B. Carroll executor of Savio's estate. Carroll went on to award Peterson control of virtually all of Savio's assets -- even though Peterson and Savio had divorced.

"The actions of the Executor were not in the best interest of the Estate or its beneficiaries," wrote Richard J. Kavanagh, the court-appointed administrator for Savio's estate.

Kavanagh was involved in the case because no one from Savio's family formally volunteered to represent the estate in court. He called the will a "purported will" in court papers.

"My concern is that this is a handwritten will that just popped up after she died," Kavanagh said this week. "It gives you the sense that it's something that's concocted."

A judge, however, accepted the will because Marcolina and Morelli testified in court March 23, 2005, that they witnessed Savio and Peterson signing the document, Kavanagh said.

Peterson dismissed Kavanagh's concerns and asserted that the lawyer is angry that he couldn't notch a hefty sum in legal fees off Savio's case.

Schuetzner, the document examiner hired by the Sun-Times, examined Savio's signature on the will and found "a lot of consistency" with Savio's other signatures.

Savio's sister, Doman, was uncertain about Savio's signature on the will. But she was more concerned about other aspects of the document, including that its first page equally divides Savio's assets among her two children and her two stepchildren.

Savio, according to Doman, said a month before her death that she'd written a new will that would leave everything to her two young sons, now ages 13 and 15.

"She told me she had a new will. She promised to get me a copy," Doman said. "She was dead before she could get it to me."

Doman added that her family wasn't aware until recently that the will named Carroll, Drew Peterson's uncle, executor of Savio's estate.

Peterson counters the family had an opportunity to get involved in the case. "If they didn't like it, well, they should have done something. They didn't," Peterson said.

Carroll did not return calls seeking comment.
Peterson Inc.

Besides Peterson's work as a cop, Savio and he had run two businesses during their married life: the tavern company, called Blue Lightning Corp., and a printing firm, DA. P.A.G.E. Inc., state records show.

Separately, Peterson dabbled in real estate. He and two partners bought and flipped two homes in 2000 and 2001.

In March 2002, both Peterson and Savio filed for divorce. On March 22, 2002, Savio agreed in court to waive any future ownership rights to the house that Drew Peterson wanted to buy for himself and Stacy in Bolingbrook.

A power of attorney document, dated about a month after that court appearance, formalized the agreement and included Savio's signature. Peterson used the document to secure a $226,600 mortgage the next day.

Peterson said Savio willingly signed the form even though the couple was separated and getting divorced. Peterson also said he bought the house without any financial help from Savio.

"I wanted to buy this place but I didn't want it tied up in divorce court," he said of the home. "I bought it without her help financially. There was nothing improper about it."

The power of attorney document that includes Savio's signature needed to be notarized -- something usually done by a notary public who has no financial interest in the deal. But Peterson himself notarized the document, which makes it difficult to independently verify Savio's signature.

"If it was a forgery, she had ample time to have her and her lawyer object and make an issue of it," said Peterson's lawyer, Joel Brodsky. "Obviously it could have been done better, but I don't know that it's anything untoward."

Contributing: Kara Spak, Natasha Korecki

[Lorie Taylor]

[Lorie Taylor]

Missing nightstand out of Kathleen, and Stacys home